Let me share something about Texas. Over the last year I’ve made a few excursions into west Texas, and the idea – and enforcement – of forced C19 mandates is foreign to the region. At restaurants, truck stops, hotels, and gas stations, no such restrictions were in effect. Most often, businesses didn’t have any signage requiring masks to enter. And very few customers I saw were compliant with any forced mandates.

I share my experiences to assure nervous folks this “sudden” revoking of forced mandates has already been in practice for months if not at least a year. Hopefully, this information will help set minds at ease about the irresponsibility of the Texas gubner. A mandate-free region is already beta-tested.

—–

Remember science is driven by trial and error. I’m curious how such certainty – mandates save lives – is possible in a data set generated from non-standardized testing of an unknown virus. This data set can indicate only trial and error, nothing more.

So what happens when revoking forced mandates in Texas doesn’t result in a huge spike in deaths and infections? Will the revealing empiricism continue to be denied?

—–

C19 is deadly. Why? Because science.

I’m excited to see how Texas plays out. Will empiricism finally have its day?

And I’m fully receptive to willingly eating the world’s most giant flock of crows. But I strongly believe – with acquired knowledge – my diet will remain crow-deficient.

—–

Fauci needs to lighten up. He can’t direct the Texas gubner to reimpose forced mandates, so either Fauci gets to tell Americans “I told you so” or Americans get to tell Fauci “You’ve got a lot to answer for, dude.”